Connection lost
Server error
The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Legal Definitions - aggregation doctrine
Behind every great lawyer is an even greater paralegal who knows where everything is.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Definition of aggregation doctrine
The aggregation doctrine is a rule that prevents a party from combining multiple claims in order to meet the minimum amount required for federal diversity jurisdiction. This means that if a party has several claims that individually do not meet the minimum amount, they cannot add them together to reach the required amount.
For example, if a plaintiff has two claims against a defendant, one for $20,000 and one for $15,000, they cannot combine them to meet the $75,000 minimum for federal diversity jurisdiction. The claims must be considered separately.
This rule is in place to prevent parties from manipulating the system and artificially creating diversity jurisdiction. It ensures that cases are heard in the appropriate court and that the jurisdictional requirements are met fairly and honestly.
The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Simple Definition
The aggregation doctrine is a rule that says you can't add up all your claims to meet the minimum amount needed for a federal court to hear your case. This is called the amount-in-controversy requirement. Basically, you can't combine a bunch of small claims to make them big enough for federal court.
It's every lawyer's dream to help shape the law, not just react to it.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+