It is better to risk saving a guilty man than to condemn an innocent one.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Legal Definitions - assisa de utrum

LSDefine

A 'reasonable person' is a legal fiction I'm pretty sure I've never met.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Definition of assisa de utrum

Definition: Assisa de utrum is a Latin term that refers to a writ used in medieval England to determine whether land claimed by a church was held by lay or spiritual tenure. The writ is named after its emphatic word, which required the fact-finder to determine whether the land belonged to the church.

Example: In the assisa de utrum, a jury was summoned to decide whether land was held by lay or spiritual tenure. This was a preliminary question to any litigation about it, for the Church claimed jurisdiction over spiritual land. Later, the Church lost this jurisdiction, and the assisa de utrum became the parson's substitute for the writ of right.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the assisa de utrum was used to determine the ownership of land claimed by the Church. The writ was important because it was the first instance known to us of the general use of the royal procedure by way of inquest in a matter of private litigation. If the answer of the inquest was that this land was held in frankalmoign, then the case went to the ecclesiastical court; if that it was lay fee, then to the appropriate lay tribunal.

I feel like I'm in a constant state of 'motion to compel' more sleep.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Simple Definition

Assisa de Utrum: A legal term that refers to a writ used in the past to determine whether land belonged to a church or a lay person. The writ was named after the word "utrum," which means "whether" in Latin. A jury was summoned to decide whether the land was held by the church or a lay person. Later, the writ was used by parsons to determine if certain land in a parish was the property of the church. If the answer was "yes," then it was the parson's land. This writ was important because it was the first instance of using a royal procedure to decide a private litigation matter.

The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

A 'reasonable person' is a legal fiction I'm pretty sure I've never met.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+