The only bar I passed this year serves drinks.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Legal Definitions - doctrine of preclusion of inconsistent positions

LSDefine

The young man knows the rules, but the old man knows the exceptions.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Definition of doctrine of preclusion of inconsistent positions

The doctrine of preclusion of inconsistent positions is a legal principle that prevents a party from taking a position in a legal proceeding that is inconsistent with a position they have taken in a previous proceeding. This principle is also known as judicial estoppel.

For example, if a person files for bankruptcy and fails to disclose all of their assets, they cannot later sue someone for damages related to those undisclosed assets. This is because they took a position in the bankruptcy proceeding that they did not have those assets, and they cannot now take a position that they do have them.

Another example is if a person testifies in court that they were not present at the scene of a crime, they cannot later take a position that they were present at the scene of the crime. This is because they took a position in court that they were not present, and they cannot now take a position that they were.

The doctrine of preclusion of inconsistent positions is important because it promotes consistency and fairness in the legal system. It prevents parties from taking advantage of the system by changing their position to suit their needs.

Justice is truth in action.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Simple Definition

The doctrine of preclusion of inconsistent positions means that a person cannot take two different positions in court that contradict each other. This is also known as judicial estoppel. The doctrine of relation back allows a court to treat an action as if it was filed at an earlier time. The doctrine of res judicata means that a final judgment on a case cannot be challenged again in court. The doctrine of revestment allows a court to regain jurisdiction over a case if the opposing parties have participated in actions that go against the court's judgment.

A 'reasonable person' is a legal fiction I'm pretty sure I've never met.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

It is better to risk saving a guilty man than to condemn an innocent one.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+