The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Legal Definitions - doctrine of the conclusiveness of the judgment

LSDefine

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Definition of doctrine of the conclusiveness of the judgment

Definition: The doctrine of the conclusiveness of the judgment is a legal principle that prevents a party from contradicting previous declarations made during the same or an earlier proceeding if the change in position would adversely affect the proceeding or constitute a fraud on the court. This is also known as judicial estoppel under estoppel.

Example: If a person sues someone for damages and claims they were not at fault, but in a previous case, they admitted to being at fault, the doctrine of the conclusiveness of the judgment would prevent them from changing their position and denying fault in the current case. This is because it would be unfair to the other party and would undermine the integrity of the legal system.

Explanation: The doctrine of the conclusiveness of the judgment is designed to ensure that parties are held accountable for their previous statements and actions in legal proceedings. It prevents them from changing their position to gain an advantage in a current case, which would be unfair to the other party. This principle is essential to maintaining the integrity of the legal system and ensuring that justice is served.

The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Simple Definition

The doctrine of the conclusiveness of the judgment, also known as judicial estoppel, is a legal rule that prevents someone from making a claim or argument that contradicts what they have previously said or what has been established as true in court. This rule is meant to prevent unfairness and ensure that people are held accountable for their statements and actions. It applies in various contexts, such as patents, contracts, and court proceedings. Essentially, if you say or do something, you can't later change your story and expect to be believed.

It is better to risk saving a guilty man than to condemn an innocent one.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Success in law school is 10% intelligence and 90% persistence.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+