Connection lost
Server error
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Legal Definitions - non procedendo ad assisam rege inconsulto
Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Definition of non procedendo ad assisam rege inconsulto
Definition:Non procedendo ad assisamrege inconsulto is a Latin term that refers to a writ used to stop the trial of a case when the king has not been consulted. This writ is used in cases that involve individuals who are in the king's service or have a close relationship with the king.
One example of non procedendo ad assisam rege inconsulto is when a case involving a member of the royal family is being tried without the king's knowledge or consent. In such a case, the writ can be used to stop the trial until the king has been consulted.
Another example is when a case involves a high-ranking official in the king's court or government. In such a case, the writ can be used to ensure that the king is aware of the case and has given his consent for it to proceed.
These examples illustrate how the writ of non procedendo ad assisam rege inconsulto was used to protect the interests of the king and his close associates. By requiring that the king be consulted before a case involving one of his own is tried, the writ ensured that the king's authority was respected and that justice was served in a manner that was consistent with the king's wishes.
If the law is on your side, pound the law. If the facts are on your side, pound the facts. If neither the law nor the facts are on your side, pound the table.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Simple Definition
Term:NON PROCEDENDO AD ASSISAMREGE INCONSULTO
Definition: Non procedendo ad assisam rege inconsulto is a legal term in Latin that refers to a writ used to stop a trial of a case that involves someone who is in the king's service or similar position, when the king has not been consulted. In simpler terms, it means that if someone who works for the king is being tried in court, the trial cannot proceed if the king has not given permission or been asked for advice.
The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+