Connection lost
Server error
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Legal Definitions - Reasonable doubt
The difference between ordinary and extraordinary is practice.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Definition of Reasonable doubt
Definition: Reasonable doubt is when jurors have enough doubt about a defendant's guilt based on a lack of evidence. This doubt must be reasonable and not just a feeling or suspicion.
Example: In a murder trial, the prosecution presents evidence that the defendant was at the scene of the crime and had a motive to kill the victim. However, there is no physical evidence linking the defendant to the murder weapon or the victim's body. The defense argues that there is reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt because there is no direct evidence connecting them to the crime.
Explanation: This example illustrates how reasonable doubt can be used in a criminal trial. Jurors must consider all the evidence presented and determine if there is enough proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime. In this case, the lack of physical evidence linking the defendant to the crime creates doubt about their guilt, which could lead to an acquittal.
The difference between ordinary and extraordinary is practice.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Simple Definition
Reasonable doubt is when the jurors are not sure if the defendant is guilty or not because there is not enough evidence to prove it. If there is reasonable doubt, the defendant cannot be found guilty.
Success in law school is 10% intelligence and 90% persistence.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+