It is better to risk saving a guilty man than to condemn an innocent one.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Legal Definitions - repugnant verdict

LSDefine

The law is a jealous mistress, and requires a long and constant courtship.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Definition of repugnant verdict

A repugnant verdict is a type of verdict that contradicts itself. This happens when a defendant is convicted and acquitted of different crimes that have identical elements. For example, if a defendant is found guilty of both murder and manslaughter, which have the same elements, it would be a repugnant verdict.

This type of verdict is illegal and cannot be used in court. It is also known as a contradictory verdict.

For example, in a case where a defendant is charged with both assault and battery, if the jury finds the defendant guilty of assault but not guilty of battery, it would be a repugnant verdict. This is because assault and battery have the same elements, and the verdict contradicts itself.

The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Simple Definition

A verdict is a decision made by a jury or judge in a court case. It determines whether someone is guilty or innocent of a crime or liable or not liable in a civil case. There are different types of verdicts, such as a guilty verdict, directed verdict, and special verdict. A repugnant verdict is a verdict that contradicts itself, such as convicting and acquitting someone of the same crime. This type of verdict is not allowed and can result in a new trial.

The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

A 'reasonable person' is a legal fiction I'm pretty sure I've never met.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+