A lawyer without books would be like a workman without tools.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Legal Definitions - repugnant verdict

LSDefine

The difference between ordinary and extraordinary is practice.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Definition of repugnant verdict

A repugnant verdict is a type of verdict that contradicts itself. This happens when a defendant is convicted and acquitted of different crimes that have identical elements. For example, if a defendant is found guilty of both murder and manslaughter, which have the same elements, it would be a repugnant verdict.

This type of verdict is illegal and cannot be used in court. It is also known as a contradictory verdict.

For example, in a case where a defendant is charged with both assault and battery, if the jury finds the defendant guilty of assault but not guilty of battery, it would be a repugnant verdict. This is because assault and battery have the same elements, and the verdict contradicts itself.

I object!... to how much coffee I need to function during finals.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Simple Definition

A verdict is a decision made by a jury or judge in a court case. It determines whether someone is guilty or innocent of a crime or liable or not liable in a civil case. There are different types of verdicts, such as a guilty verdict, directed verdict, and special verdict. A repugnant verdict is a verdict that contradicts itself, such as convicting and acquitting someone of the same crime. This type of verdict is not allowed and can result in a new trial.

Where you see wrong or inequality or injustice, speak out, because this is your country. This is your democracy. Make it. Protect it. Pass it on.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Make crime pay. Become a lawyer.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+