Justice is truth in action.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Legal Definitions - reverse doctrine of equivalents

LSDefine

The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Definition of reverse doctrine of equivalents

The reverse doctrine of equivalents is a legal principle that prevents a product or process from being considered an infringement of a patent if it performs the same function as the patented invention but in a substantially different way. This is the opposite of the doctrine of equivalents, which allows for infringement to be found even if the accused product or process falls outside the literal scope of the patent claims.

For example, if a patent claims a specific method for producing a chemical compound, and another company produces the same compound using a different method, they may not be found to be infringing on the patent under the reverse doctrine of equivalents.

The reverse doctrine of equivalents is intended to prevent patent holders from claiming infringement over products or processes that are significantly different from their invention, but still perform the same function. It allows for innovation and competition in the marketplace.

A 'reasonable person' is a legal fiction I'm pretty sure I've never met.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Simple Definition

The reverse doctrine of equivalents is a legal theory used in patent cases to determine if something is infringing on a patent. It means that even if something doesn't exactly match the language of a patent, it can still be considered infringement if it performs the same function in a similar way. This is to prevent people from making small changes to avoid infringing on a patent.

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Success in law school is 10% intelligence and 90% persistence.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+