Connection lost
Server error
Where you see wrong or inequality or injustice, speak out, because this is your country. This is your democracy. Make it. Protect it. Pass it on.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Legal Definitions - Rule in Wild's Case
The law is a jealous mistress, and requires a long and constant courtship.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Definition of Rule in Wild's Case
The Rule in Wild's Case is a legal principle that applies to property grants. It states that if a grant is made to "A and A's children," and A's children do not exist at the time the grant takes effect, then the grant is considered a fee tail. However, if A's children do exist at the time the grant takes effect, then the grant is considered a joint tenancy.
For example, if a property is granted to John and his children, but John has no children at the time the grant takes effect, then John would have a fee tail in the property. However, if John has children at the time the grant takes effect, then he and his children would have a joint tenancy in the property.
It's important to note that the Rule in Wild's Case has been abolished in most states, along with the fee tail. This means that property grants are typically interpreted differently today, and the concept of a fee tail is no longer recognized in many jurisdictions.
Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Simple Definition
The Rule in Wild's Case is a legal rule that determines how a grant of property to "A and A's children" is interpreted. If A's children do not exist at the time the grant is made, the property is considered a fee tail. However, if A's children do exist at the time of the grant, the property is considered a joint tenancy. This rule has been abolished in most states along with the fee tail.
The only bar I passed this year serves drinks.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+