Connection lost
Server error
It is better to risk saving a guilty man than to condemn an innocent one.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Legal Definitions - transaction causation
The difference between ordinary and extraordinary is practice.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Definition of transaction causation
Definition:Transaction causation refers to the fact that an investor would not have engaged in a given transaction if the other party had made truthful statements at the required time.
Example: Let's say that a company is planning to issue new shares of stock. The company's CEO knows that the company is in financial trouble and that the stock is likely to lose value. However, the CEO does not disclose this information to potential investors. An investor buys the stock, but later finds out about the company's financial troubles and suffers losses as a result. In this case, the investor could argue that transaction causation exists because they would not have bought the stock if the CEO had made truthful statements.
This example illustrates how transaction causation can be used as a defense in securities cases. If an investor can prove that they would not have engaged in a transaction if the other party had made truthful statements, they may be able to recover damages.
If the law is on your side, pound the law. If the facts are on your side, pound the facts. If neither the law nor the facts are on your side, pound the table.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Simple Definition
Transaction causation refers to the idea that if someone had been truthful about a certain thing, a person would not have made a particular transaction. For example, if someone had told the truth about a product, a person would not have bought it. In the world of finance, this is often used as a defense in cases where someone has lost money due to false information being given.
Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+