Connection lost
Server error
I feel like I'm in a constant state of 'motion to compel' more sleep.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Legal Definitions - risk-utility test
The young man knows the rules, but the old man knows the exceptions.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Definition of risk-utility test
The risk-utility test is a method used to hold a manufacturerresponsible for product liability. If the evidence shows that a reasonable person would conclude that the benefits of a product's particular design versus the feasibility of an alternative safer design did not outweigh the dangers inherent in the original design, then the manufacturer can be held liable.
For example, if a car manufacturer designs a car with a faulty brake system that causes accidents, the manufacturer can be held liable if it is determined that a safer alternative design was feasible and the benefits of the faulty design did not outweigh the dangers.
Another example could be a pharmaceutical company that produces a drug with harmful side effects. If it is determined that a safer alternative was feasible and the benefits of the harmful drug did not outweigh the dangers, the company can be held liable.
These examples illustrate how the risk-utility test is used to determine if a manufacturer is responsible for product liability.
It's every lawyer's dream to help shape the law, not just react to it.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Simple Definition
A risk-utility test is a way to determine if a manufacturer should be held responsible for a product that is dangerous. It looks at whether the benefits of the product's design outweigh the risks, and if there could have been a safer alternative design. If a reasonable person would say that the risks were too great compared to the benefits, the manufacturer may be held liable. This is also called a danger-utility test or risk-benefit test.
You win some, you lose some, and some you just bill by the hour.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+